<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Creating A Customer Experience &#8211; The Online Advantage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grokdotcom.com/index.php/2006/09/14/creating-a-customer-experience-the-online-advantage/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2006/09/14/creating-a-customer-experience-the-online-advantage/</link>
	<description>Marketing blog focused on marketing optimization, improving website conversion rates, search engine marketing, web analytics, word of mouth, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:58:28 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Per "Pierre"  Jørgensen</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2006/09/14/creating-a-customer-experience-the-online-advantage/comment-page-1/#comment-229</link>
		<dc:creator>Per "Pierre"  Jørgensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://67.59.138.131/2006/09/14/creating-a-customer-experience-the-online-advantage/#comment-229</guid>
		<description>The quality of copy will only be on the radar for decision makers who insist on measuring. If the benchmark for the site&#039;s quality is whether internal stakeholders and a self-selected subset of vocal customer feel it looks good, there is no incentive to spend money on improving non-sexy elements like copy.



There&#039;s a disparity of supply, too: You&#039;ll easily find designers and programmers who can string together workmanlike but grammatically adequate sentences, while it&#039;s much more difficult to find a writer whose copy sings and who can also put together an adequate layout. That means you&#039;ll need to budget two FTEs for a great result when one would buy you an average result.



Unless the executive site owner&#039;s year-end objectives include conversion rates, she&#039;s unlikely to take the risk of defending that extra cost. A much more likely and common scenario is that the site  is judged on looks and traffic volume instead.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The quality of copy will only be on the radar for decision makers who insist on measuring. If the benchmark for the site&#8217;s quality is whether internal stakeholders and a self-selected subset of vocal customer feel it looks good, there is no incentive to spend money on improving non-sexy elements like copy.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a disparity of supply, too: You&#8217;ll easily find designers and programmers who can string together workmanlike but grammatically adequate sentences, while it&#8217;s much more difficult to find a writer whose copy sings and who can also put together an adequate layout. That means you&#8217;ll need to budget two FTEs for a great result when one would buy you an average result.</p>
<p>Unless the executive site owner&#8217;s year-end objectives include conversion rates, she&#8217;s unlikely to take the risk of defending that extra cost. A much more likely and common scenario is that the site  is judged on looks and traffic volume instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
