Questions? (877) 643-7244
FutureNow Post
Tuesday, Jan. 30, 2007 at 11:57 am

Landing Page Optimization 2007

By Bryan Eisenberg
January 30th, 2007

Check out today’s SearchDay article we contributed.

According to a recent Marketwatch story, a growing number of advertisers are cutting their spending on search campaigns. The reason? Keyword inflation and low conversion rates.

So let’s get this straight — instead of taking the abundant traffic from search engines and working on ways to better convert that traffic, many advertisers are abandoning search in whole or in part, looking for a cheaper way to drive traffic. What do they expect will happen with the new traffic once it gets to their non-converting sites?…

…This situation is NOT Google’s fault! Blaming Google for your traffic woes is like a brick and mortar store blaming the city for its traffic. Once the customers walk through the door of your store, it’s your responsibility to convert them.

If people kept walking into your brick and mortar store, and over 80 percent left after their second step, you would probably do something to entice them to come further into your store. However, this happens every day on virtually every Web site out there, and marketers often do nothing about it.

Read more of the SearchDay article to find out why Landing Page Optimization is going to hit the mainstream in 2007.

No TweetBacks yet. (Be the first to Tweet this post)

Add Your Comments

Print this Article
Share

Bryan Eisenberg is the co-author of New York Times and Wall Street Journal bestselling books Call to Action, Waiting For Your Cat to Bark and Always Be Testing. Bryan is available as a professional speaker. You can friend him on Facebook or follow him on Twitter (@TheGrok).

More articles from Bryan Eisenberg

Get a To-DO List to Fix Your Website Today!

Let Us Help You Achieve Better Results

Name:
Your Company:
Your Email:
Your Phone:
Company Website (optional):


Comments (optional):

Loading
Marketing Optimization Blog
FREE Newsletter Sign Up
send it once every: