<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We Tried That Already</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grokdotcom.com/index.php/2007/02/16/we-tried-that-already/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/02/16/we-tried-that-already/</link>
	<description>Marketing blog focused on marketing optimization, improving website conversion rates, search engine marketing, web analytics, word of mouth, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:54:04 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Grant Simmons</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/02/16/we-tried-that-already/comment-page-1/#comment-1105470</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant Simmons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/02/16/we-tried-that-already/#comment-1105470</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t mean to sound so harsh.. apologies to clients everywhere... had exactly the conversation you&#039;re suggesting with a prospective client... I had recommendations from colleagues, proven results, yet they insisted that everything I suggested had been done, and didn&#039;t work. After 20 minutes of probing into their process and analytics of success, I gave up trying to &#039;suggest&#039; their method *could have been* flawed, results skewed and thanked them for their time, and walked away.

You&#039;ll never get a satisfied client out of those types of prospects, unfortunately, even if you deliver above and beyond, they already know it&#039;s not going to work.

Started to sound harsh again... need a cuppa tea :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t mean to sound so harsh.. apologies to clients everywhere&#8230; had exactly the conversation you&#8217;re suggesting with a prospective client&#8230; I had recommendations from colleagues, proven results, yet they insisted that everything I suggested had been done, and didn&#8217;t work. After 20 minutes of probing into their process and analytics of success, I gave up trying to &#8217;suggest&#8217; their method *could have been* flawed, results skewed and thanked them for their time, and walked away.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll never get a satisfied client out of those types of prospects, unfortunately, even if you deliver above and beyond, they already know it&#8217;s not going to work.</p>
<p>Started to sound harsh again&#8230; need a cuppa tea <img src='http://www.grokdotcom.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant Simmons</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/02/16/we-tried-that-already/comment-page-1/#comment-1105469</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant Simmons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/02/16/we-tried-that-already/#comment-1105469</guid>
		<description>Clients either know what a &#039;professional&#039; brings to the table, or they don&#039;t.

If they&#039;ve tried what you&#039;re suggesting, then why are you there? It obviously didn&#039;t work, but *maybe* not because it isn&#039;t the right thing to do for results.

Any number of parameters could have been forgotten, omitted, bent or otherwise implemented in a different fashion from what you&#039;re suggesting...

You should be consulted because of what you bring to the table. Clients that second guess with &quot;I already tried that&quot; should second guess themselves as to why they&#039;re talking to you in the first place!

People call consultants for best, or better advice. If they don&#039;t listen to it, shame on them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clients either know what a &#8216;professional&#8217; brings to the table, or they don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>If they&#8217;ve tried what you&#8217;re suggesting, then why are you there? It obviously didn&#8217;t work, but *maybe* not because it isn&#8217;t the right thing to do for results.</p>
<p>Any number of parameters could have been forgotten, omitted, bent or otherwise implemented in a different fashion from what you&#8217;re suggesting&#8230;</p>
<p>You should be consulted because of what you bring to the table. Clients that second guess with &#8220;I already tried that&#8221; should second guess themselves as to why they&#8217;re talking to you in the first place!</p>
<p>People call consultants for best, or better advice. If they don&#8217;t listen to it, shame on them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Baas</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/02/16/we-tried-that-already/comment-page-1/#comment-585</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Baas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/02/16/we-tried-that-already/#comment-585</guid>
		<description>I agree that trying some fix that you read about is not the same as figuring out what&#039;s wrong. Many of the things I &quot;tried&quot; early in my career were weak and ill-informed attempts to duplicate what some book told me to do. I look back on a lot of those attempts as laughable now. I simply didn&#039;t have the depth of experience to understand the way to carry out what was suggested, much less test it effectively.

Improving conversion rates is a skill that grows based on lots of trial and error (and lots of mistakes along the way). It&#039;s not one-time test and quit situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that trying some fix that you read about is not the same as figuring out what&#8217;s wrong. Many of the things I &#8220;tried&#8221; early in my career were weak and ill-informed attempts to duplicate what some book told me to do. I look back on a lot of those attempts as laughable now. I simply didn&#8217;t have the depth of experience to understand the way to carry out what was suggested, much less test it effectively.</p>
<p>Improving conversion rates is a skill that grows based on lots of trial and error (and lots of mistakes along the way). It&#8217;s not one-time test and quit situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
