<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Can Afford A Clue; Instead They Want Informers?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grokdotcom.com/index.php/2007/04/16/google-can-afford-a-clue-instead-they-want-informers/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/04/16/google-can-afford-a-clue-instead-they-want-informers/</link>
	<description>Marketing blog focused on marketing optimization, improving website conversion rates, search engine marketing, web analytics, word of mouth, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:52:06 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Article Submission</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/04/16/google-can-afford-a-clue-instead-they-want-informers/comment-page-1/#comment-1084710</link>
		<dc:creator>Article Submission</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/04/16/google-can-afford-a-clue-instead-they-want-informers/#comment-1084710</guid>
		<description>Why would you ever report a good place to buy links? Getting back links is 80% of today&#039;s seo game.

Thanks you Jeffery for all your hard work.

We look froward to having you on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.webmasterradio.fm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Webmaster Radio&lt;/a&gt; again</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would you ever report a good place to buy links? Getting back links is 80% of today&#8217;s seo game.</p>
<p>Thanks you Jeffery for all your hard work.</p>
<p>We look froward to having you on <a href="http://www.webmasterradio.fm">Webmaster Radio</a> again</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yellow Page Advertising WebLog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Learn How to Earn Money on the Internet</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/04/16/google-can-afford-a-clue-instead-they-want-informers/comment-page-1/#comment-109001</link>
		<dc:creator>Yellow Page Advertising WebLog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Learn How to Earn Money on the Internet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/04/16/google-can-afford-a-clue-instead-they-want-informers/#comment-109001</guid>
		<description>[...] Google Can Afford A Clue; Instead They Want Informers? &#8230; form of advertising, and no &#8230; I don&#8217;t buy links or sell links on my websites, but &#8230; Google penalize sites that sell paid links while at the same time encouraging them to place AdSense on their websites http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/04/16/google-can-afford-a-clue-instead-they-want-informers/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google Can Afford A Clue; Instead They Want Informers? &#8230; form of advertising, and no &#8230; I don&#8217;t buy links or sell links on my websites, but &#8230; Google penalize sites that sell paid links while at the same time encouraging them to place AdSense on their websites <a href="http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/04/16/google-can-afford-a-clue-instead-they-want-informers/">http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/04/16/google-can-afford-a-clue-instead-they-want-informers/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smufty</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/04/16/google-can-afford-a-clue-instead-they-want-informers/comment-page-1/#comment-37820</link>
		<dc:creator>Smufty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 16:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/04/16/google-can-afford-a-clue-instead-they-want-informers/#comment-37820</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d have thought if the system relies heavily on links then you&#039;re going to need a LOT of links to make a real difference - and it would be cheaper to buy an adwords advert?

Of course advertising with adwords is a black art in itself and not cost effective for many sites, mine included.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d have thought if the system relies heavily on links then you&#8217;re going to need a LOT of links to make a real difference &#8211; and it would be cheaper to buy an adwords advert?</p>
<p>Of course advertising with adwords is a black art in itself and not cost effective for many sites, mine included.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Goodman</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/04/16/google-can-afford-a-clue-instead-they-want-informers/comment-page-1/#comment-34076</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Goodman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 02:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/04/16/google-can-afford-a-clue-instead-they-want-informers/#comment-34076</guid>
		<description>In one of my enthusiastic but brief flashes of participation in the SEO world, at an SES 4+ years ago, I stood up and asked the Google panelist how they could make a distinction between &quot;just links&quot; and links that were covertly paid for. (To me, that spelled a big hole in the premise that PageRank measured pure reputation.)

The Googler didn&#039;t respond to my question, but did give me a speech about &quot;what I need to do is to focus on x, y, and z for my site,&quot; even though I really was raising it as a fundamental issue of concern, nothing to do with &quot;my site.&quot;

It was then that I learned that large search companies are prone to dodging fundamental issues of concern when it comes to organic spam tactics. Here we are in 2007 - 2007, Jeff! - and Google still seems to have this gaping hole in its algo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In one of my enthusiastic but brief flashes of participation in the SEO world, at an SES 4+ years ago, I stood up and asked the Google panelist how they could make a distinction between &#8220;just links&#8221; and links that were covertly paid for. (To me, that spelled a big hole in the premise that PageRank measured pure reputation.)</p>
<p>The Googler didn&#8217;t respond to my question, but did give me a speech about &#8220;what I need to do is to focus on x, y, and z for my site,&#8221; even though I really was raising it as a fundamental issue of concern, nothing to do with &#8220;my site.&#8221;</p>
<p>It was then that I learned that large search companies are prone to dodging fundamental issues of concern when it comes to organic spam tactics. Here we are in 2007 &#8211; 2007, Jeff! &#8211; and Google still seems to have this gaping hole in its algo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Eisenberg</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/04/16/google-can-afford-a-clue-instead-they-want-informers/comment-page-1/#comment-34074</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Eisenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 02:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/04/16/google-can-afford-a-clue-instead-they-want-informers/#comment-34074</guid>
		<description>Julie, You make good points. These are the questions others are asking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julie, You make good points. These are the questions others are asking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/04/16/google-can-afford-a-clue-instead-they-want-informers/comment-page-1/#comment-34052</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 01:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/04/16/google-can-afford-a-clue-instead-they-want-informers/#comment-34052</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t buy links or sell links on my websites, but I have a few problems with this:

1) Competitors can EASILY manipulate this system.

2) This is a Google double standard.  How can Google penalize sites that sell paid links while at the same time encouraging them to place AdSense on their websites?  Does Google want to be the only company that benefits from a popular website&#039;s link love?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t buy links or sell links on my websites, but I have a few problems with this:</p>
<p>1) Competitors can EASILY manipulate this system.</p>
<p>2) This is a Google double standard.  How can Google penalize sites that sell paid links while at the same time encouraging them to place AdSense on their websites?  Does Google want to be the only company that benefits from a popular website&#8217;s link love?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
