<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: $6B Paid For aQuantive: Ad Network Bubble?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grokdotcom.com/index.php/2007/05/18/6b-paid-for-aquantive-ad-network-bubble/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/05/18/6b-paid-for-aquantive-ad-network-bubble/</link>
	<description>Marketing blog focused on marketing optimization, improving website conversion rates, search engine marketing, web analytics, word of mouth, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:38:51 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom C</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/05/18/6b-paid-for-aquantive-ad-network-bubble/comment-page-1/#comment-56184</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 06:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/05/18/6b-paid-for-aquantive-ad-network-bubble/#comment-56184</guid>
		<description>Interesting one.  Without knowing the going on&#039;s, it seems strange to pay twice as much for a company, unless it&#039;s to put up the prices of other companies and make them harder for Microsoft&#039;s competitors to be bought out. Or they just loved the idea of doing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting one.  Without knowing the going on&#8217;s, it seems strange to pay twice as much for a company, unless it&#8217;s to put up the prices of other companies and make them harder for Microsoft&#8217;s competitors to be bought out. Or they just loved the idea of doing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
