<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should Content Be Free?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grokdotcom.com/index.php/2007/06/20/should-content-be-free/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/06/20/should-content-be-free/</link>
	<description>Marketing blog focused on marketing optimization, improving website conversion rates, search engine marketing, web analytics, word of mouth, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:54:04 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ken Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/06/20/should-content-be-free/comment-page-1/#comment-136125</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 22:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/06/20/should-content-be-free/#comment-136125</guid>
		<description>I believe that there will always be content that people will be willing to pay for. Some day, I expect to see big companies creating the very best of content, organizing it and making it available on a micro-payment basis. Assuming content of the highest quality, a penny a page would be a good deal for the consumer and would be a goldmine for the publisher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that there will always be content that people will be willing to pay for. Some day, I expect to see big companies creating the very best of content, organizing it and making it available on a micro-payment basis. Assuming content of the highest quality, a penny a page would be a good deal for the consumer and would be a goldmine for the publisher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Death of Paid Newspaper Content</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/06/20/should-content-be-free/comment-page-1/#comment-135930</link>
		<dc:creator>The Death of Paid Newspaper Content</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 18:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/06/20/should-content-be-free/#comment-135930</guid>
		<description>[...] safe for now. Regardless, all of this raises the stickiest point of the old media probate battle: Should content be free?  Technorati Tags: Dow Jones, new media, newspapers, new york times, Publishing, Publishing 2.0, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] safe for now. Regardless, all of this raises the stickiest point of the old media probate battle: Should content be free?  Technorati Tags: Dow Jones, new media, newspapers, new york times, Publishing, Publishing 2.0, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Rehnke</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/06/20/should-content-be-free/comment-page-1/#comment-94419</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Rehnke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 22:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/06/20/should-content-be-free/#comment-94419</guid>
		<description>According to the www.savenetradio.org site, commercial radio pays NO ROYALTIES!!! This is amazing and, if true, points out the power of the lobbies to screw the little guy, yet again.
===========================================================
From that site:

MYTH:  Broadcast radio, satellite radio and Internet Radio pay the same amount of royalties to creators of music, or pay proportionate relative to the size of their businesses.

FACT:  The smallest medium – Internet radio – pays the most royalties; and under the new CRB royalty scheme the smallest webcasters will pay the highest relative royalties in amounts shockingly disproportionate to their revenue.  

Broadcast radio, an industry with $20 billion in annual revenue, is exempt and pays no performance royalties to record companies or recording artists. 
Satellite radio, which has approximately $2 billion in annual revenue pays between 3 and 7% of revenue in sound recording performance royalties.  
The six largest Internet-only radio services anticipate combined revenue of only $37.5 million in 2006, but will pay a whopping 47% (or $17.6 million) in sound recording performance royalties under the new CRB ruling.  In 2008 combined revenues will total only $73.6 million, but royalties will be 58% or $42.4 million. 
Small Internet radio services are essentially bankrupted by the CRB ruling, with most anticipating royalty obligations equaling or exceeding total revenue.  
 
from: http://www.savenetradio.org/about/myths_and_facts.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the <a href="http://www.savenetradio.org">http://www.savenetradio.org</a> site, commercial radio pays NO ROYALTIES!!! This is amazing and, if true, points out the power of the lobbies to screw the little guy, yet again.<br />
===========================================================<br />
From that site:</p>
<p>MYTH:  Broadcast radio, satellite radio and Internet Radio pay the same amount of royalties to creators of music, or pay proportionate relative to the size of their businesses.</p>
<p>FACT:  The smallest medium – Internet radio – pays the most royalties; and under the new CRB royalty scheme the smallest webcasters will pay the highest relative royalties in amounts shockingly disproportionate to their revenue.  </p>
<p>Broadcast radio, an industry with $20 billion in annual revenue, is exempt and pays no performance royalties to record companies or recording artists.<br />
Satellite radio, which has approximately $2 billion in annual revenue pays between 3 and 7% of revenue in sound recording performance royalties.<br />
The six largest Internet-only radio services anticipate combined revenue of only $37.5 million in 2006, but will pay a whopping 47% (or $17.6 million) in sound recording performance royalties under the new CRB ruling.  In 2008 combined revenues will total only $73.6 million, but royalties will be 58% or $42.4 million.<br />
Small Internet radio services are essentially bankrupted by the CRB ruling, with most anticipating royalty obligations equaling or exceeding total revenue.  </p>
<p>from: <a href="http://www.savenetradio.org/about/myths_and_facts.html">http://www.savenetradio.org/about/myths_and_facts.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dena Matthews</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/06/20/should-content-be-free/comment-page-1/#comment-89529</link>
		<dc:creator>Dena Matthews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 12:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/06/20/should-content-be-free/#comment-89529</guid>
		<description>There is no licensing model in place for digital artists like myself to distribute our work for free and still make a living doing it.  The industry I&#039;m in of medical illustrators and medical animators is fighting to retain copyright and ownership so that we can be compensated for our life&#039;s work.  Our work will continue to be valuable for many years to come!  We should not allow our content to be free for others to use, distribute, etc.  Our work is already visible on the internet so people can see it- but it&#039;s not right that others should profit off of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no licensing model in place for digital artists like myself to distribute our work for free and still make a living doing it.  The industry I&#8217;m in of medical illustrators and medical animators is fighting to retain copyright and ownership so that we can be compensated for our life&#8217;s work.  Our work will continue to be valuable for many years to come!  We should not allow our content to be free for others to use, distribute, etc.  Our work is already visible on the internet so people can see it- but it&#8217;s not right that others should profit off of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Radio&#39;s Day Off: Is it Over for Webcasters?</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/06/20/should-content-be-free/comment-page-1/#comment-87576</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Radio&#39;s Day Off: Is it Over for Webcasters?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 17:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/06/20/should-content-be-free/#comment-87576</guid>
		<description>[...] P.P.S. - What do you think? Can Web radio survive? Should small-time webcasters pay the same fees as big radio stations? Should content be free? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] P.P.S. &#8211; What do you think? Can Web radio survive? Should small-time webcasters pay the same fees as big radio stations? Should content be free? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Information Marketer&#8217;s Hotsheet &#171; The Information Marketer&#8217;s Hotsheet</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/06/20/should-content-be-free/comment-page-1/#comment-79855</link>
		<dc:creator>The Information Marketer&#8217;s Hotsheet &#171; The Information Marketer&#8217;s Hotsheet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 14:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/06/20/should-content-be-free/#comment-79855</guid>
		<description>[...] 1. The blueprint for a brilliant blog launch  2. Should content be free?  3. Blogging toolbox: 120 + resources for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 1. The blueprint for a brilliant blog launch  2. Should content be free?  3. Blogging toolbox: 120 + resources for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
