<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Techmeme, Technorati &#8212; Let&#8217;s Blog the Whole Thing Off&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grokdotcom.com/index.php/2007/10/01/techmeme-leaderboard/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/10/01/techmeme-leaderboard/</link>
	<description>Marketing blog focused on marketing optimization, improving website conversion rates, search engine marketing, web analytics, word of mouth, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:58:14 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Internet Marketing &#187; Technorati rank means nothing</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/10/01/techmeme-leaderboard/comment-page-1/#comment-233752</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet Marketing &#187; Technorati rank means nothing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 03:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/10/01/techmeme-leaderboard/#comment-233752</guid>
		<description>[...] recently, he asked again while discussing the Techmeme Leaderboard&#8230; so I would to &#8220;share my thoughts&#8221; as he [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recently, he asked again while discussing the Techmeme Leaderboard&#8230; so I would to &#8220;share my thoughts&#8221; as he [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/10/01/techmeme-leaderboard/comment-page-1/#comment-230600</link>
		<dc:creator>@Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 10:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/10/01/techmeme-leaderboard/#comment-230600</guid>
		<description>There is a new blog aggregator/ranking site called Social Rank that is initiated by manual peer review. They claim to use an interesting mix of attributes when assigning rank. I wrote a post about it &lt;a href=&quot;http://hdbizblog.com/blog/2007/10/03/productivity-zen/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here, at HD BizBlog.&lt;/a&gt;

They are listing posts from about 3,000 blogs in 30 different categories. Is this the future of blog ranking?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a new blog aggregator/ranking site called Social Rank that is initiated by manual peer review. They claim to use an interesting mix of attributes when assigning rank. I wrote a post about it <a href="http://hdbizblog.com/blog/2007/10/03/productivity-zen/">here, at HD BizBlog.</a></p>
<p>They are listing posts from about 3,000 blogs in 30 different categories. Is this the future of blog ranking?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Chaney</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/10/01/techmeme-leaderboard/comment-page-1/#comment-228853</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Chaney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 12:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/10/01/techmeme-leaderboard/#comment-228853</guid>
		<description>The A-list is dead. Technorati is a joke. TechMeme is limited in its scope. I don&#039;t suggest that rank is not important. I just think, with the advent of social media, particularly (yes, I&#039;m gonna say it) Facebook, the playing field has changed. 

I continue to echo the opinion expressed by Copyblogger Brian Clark in that the real value in blogs at this juncture is that they provide real &quot;value.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The A-list is dead. Technorati is a joke. TechMeme is limited in its scope. I don&#8217;t suggest that rank is not important. I just think, with the advent of social media, particularly (yes, I&#8217;m gonna say it) Facebook, the playing field has changed. </p>
<p>I continue to echo the opinion expressed by Copyblogger Brian Clark in that the real value in blogs at this juncture is that they provide real &#8220;value.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/10/01/techmeme-leaderboard/comment-page-1/#comment-228130</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 04:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/10/01/techmeme-leaderboard/#comment-228130</guid>
		<description>As you mention Rank is a double edged sword. You want a solid rank to ensure a certain &#039;community status&#039; but you also want the right kind of links. Rank can be skewed by link-baiting posts, by being sensational or pay per links.

You not only want Rank, but you need &#039;quality&#039; Rank. You want links from bloggers within your area that are linking to a broad section of your content, not just that one hit post.

People also use a single metric to evaluate the success of their blog. Multiple metrics should be used. Talking to Jeremiah Owyang, he was adamant that &lt;a href=&quot;http://scissormonkey.wordpress.com/2007/07/23/blog-grade-is-not-just-one-thing/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Blog Grade is Not Just One Thing&lt;/a&gt;, it isn&#039;t just a single metric. You need to evaluate your blog using a variety of metrics to ensure that you are meeting your goals.

As you mention a single metric can become valueless, like the Technorati gliche that gave everyone an Authority of 1. It was fun to be number 1 during that time period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you mention Rank is a double edged sword. You want a solid rank to ensure a certain &#8216;community status&#8217; but you also want the right kind of links. Rank can be skewed by link-baiting posts, by being sensational or pay per links.</p>
<p>You not only want Rank, but you need &#8216;quality&#8217; Rank. You want links from bloggers within your area that are linking to a broad section of your content, not just that one hit post.</p>
<p>People also use a single metric to evaluate the success of their blog. Multiple metrics should be used. Talking to Jeremiah Owyang, he was adamant that <a href="http://scissormonkey.wordpress.com/2007/07/23/blog-grade-is-not-just-one-thing/">Blog Grade is Not Just One Thing</a>, it isn&#8217;t just a single metric. You need to evaluate your blog using a variety of metrics to ensure that you are meeting your goals.</p>
<p>As you mention a single metric can become valueless, like the Technorati gliche that gave everyone an Authority of 1. It was fun to be number 1 during that time period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary&#8217;s Blog &#187; Link Lovin&#8217;: True Love or Cheap Date?</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/10/01/techmeme-leaderboard/comment-page-1/#comment-227537</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary&#8217;s Blog &#187; Link Lovin&#8217;: True Love or Cheap Date?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 22:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/10/01/techmeme-leaderboard/#comment-227537</guid>
		<description>[...] More:  Rpbert Gorell, GrokDotCom, Techmeme, Techorati - Let&#8217;s Blog The Whole Thing Off&#8230; John Whiteside on Web 2.0 and all that jazz, Monkey Business  Mike Sansone with some useful stats [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More:  Rpbert Gorell, GrokDotCom, Techmeme, Techorati &#8211; Let&#8217;s Blog The Whole Thing Off&#8230; John Whiteside on Web 2.0 and all that jazz, Monkey Business  Mike Sansone with some useful stats [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Pozadzides</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/10/01/techmeme-leaderboard/comment-page-1/#comment-227406</link>
		<dc:creator>John Pozadzides</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 21:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/10/01/techmeme-leaderboard/#comment-227406</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://lorelle.wordpress.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Lorelle&lt;/a&gt; often likes to comment that &quot;...stats don&#039;t matter!&quot;.  But I&#039;m not sure I entirely agree...

I&#039;ve been teaching people HTML (on HTMLHelp.com) literally since it was created.  And out of 100 million visits over the past more than a decade, I&#039;d be willing to bet that (and I&#039;m being really conservative here) at least half of those people cared if there were going to be visitors to the sites they were building.

I&#039;ve had people ask me &lt;strong&gt;at least&lt;/strong&gt; 10,000 times how they can get more traffic to their site.  So, I think it&#039;s fair to say that although people may have different reasons - they almost all care about ranking as a measure of how much attention they are getting as compared to the next guy.

Given that ranking is going to be important, I worry about those who place too much emphasis on it.  Especially if they are focusing on just one metric - like Technorati.

Sure, I keep an eye on my stats (FeedBurner subscribers, Technoratic, PageRank, etc.) but at the end of the day I find it&#039;s more important to obsess over the quality of the articles I put out.  Well, that and a little bit of promotion here and there.  If you stick to the basics, the traffic &lt;em&gt;will come&lt;/em&gt;.  I promise.

John P.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://lorelle.wordpress.com">Lorelle</a> often likes to comment that &#8220;&#8230;stats don&#8217;t matter!&#8221;.  But I&#8217;m not sure I entirely agree&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been teaching people HTML (on HTMLHelp.com) literally since it was created.  And out of 100 million visits over the past more than a decade, I&#8217;d be willing to bet that (and I&#8217;m being really conservative here) at least half of those people cared if there were going to be visitors to the sites they were building.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve had people ask me <strong>at least</strong> 10,000 times how they can get more traffic to their site.  So, I think it&#8217;s fair to say that although people may have different reasons &#8211; they almost all care about ranking as a measure of how much attention they are getting as compared to the next guy.</p>
<p>Given that ranking is going to be important, I worry about those who place too much emphasis on it.  Especially if they are focusing on just one metric &#8211; like Technorati.</p>
<p>Sure, I keep an eye on my stats (FeedBurner subscribers, Technoratic, PageRank, etc.) but at the end of the day I find it&#8217;s more important to obsess over the quality of the articles I put out.  Well, that and a little bit of promotion here and there.  If you stick to the basics, the traffic <em>will come</em>.  I promise.</p>
<p>John P.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lars</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/10/01/techmeme-leaderboard/comment-page-1/#comment-227296</link>
		<dc:creator>Lars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 19:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/10/01/techmeme-leaderboard/#comment-227296</guid>
		<description>Technorati has serious problems indexing and ranking (Wordpress) blogs. Google does NOT have that problem. Technorati seems like a joke these days, I would not rely on their rankings. My blog has not been updated for 40+ days, and I&#039;m far from alone. I think Technorati will lose their position within a year unless they start to get the basics right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technorati has serious problems indexing and ranking (Wordpress) blogs. Google does NOT have that problem. Technorati seems like a joke these days, I would not rely on their rankings. My blog has not been updated for 40+ days, and I&#8217;m far from alone. I think Technorati will lose their position within a year unless they start to get the basics right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
