Questions? (877) 643-7244
FutureNow Post
Tuesday, Oct. 9, 2007 at 2:26 pm

The YouTube Effect: Copyright Law Will Eat Itself

By Robert Gorell
October 9th, 2007

hitting copyright law where it counts...Jeff Atwood’s “YouTube: The Big Copyright Lie” may be the most telling — and concise — article ever written about today’s online copyright law fiasco. According to Atwood, the company’s whole existence teeters a fundamental lie: that so-called “fair use” is in the eye of the beholder, and the only beholders who matter are the copyright’s owner and their attorneys (read: copyrighted material is kept live on YouTube indefinitely until either the copyright holder or their lawyers complain).

Atwood shows that YouTube’s copyright tips page, although refreshingly plain-spoken, is a bit self-righteous, considering that, as he puts it, 90% of the content on YouTube is ripped-off copyrighted material…

It’s completely glossed over on the YouTube copyright page in favor of 100% original content, but the loophole in copyright is fair use. Under the banner of fair use, you could legally upload a video without the copyright holder’s permission. Anyone who contributes anything to the web should have the four factors of fair use commited [sic] to memory by now:

  1. the purpose of the use
  2. the nature of the copyrighted work
  3. the relative amount of the portion used
  4. the market effect of the use on the copyrighted work

Atwood goes on to explain why “The typical YouTube clip does well on the last two factors of the fair use test, but utterly fails the first two.” It’s an eye-opener for anyone who creates original content.

Meanwhile, our attitudes toward the media landscape continues to shift according to generational fault lines. In AdvertisingAge, Mike Vorhaus shares some telling figures:

Americans also believe their use of online video has cannibalized TV. Overall, more than 15% of respondents say they watch TV less as a result of watching online videos. And 25% of 18- to 24-year-olds believe that online video is cannibalizing their TV viewing. In comparison, fewer than 11% of 45- to 54-year-olds report such cannibalization.

Hmm… Does it count as watching TV if you’re watching TV on YouTube?

Add Your Comments

Comments (3)

  1. Garden Lover…

    Hey, this is not completely true, if you do a search in Google you will see why i say that….

  2. I think the younger people choose to watch online as they can chose what they want. Whereas older people will be happy with Emmerdale.

    The online copyright situation needs to be looked at as it is only get worse day by day.

  3. You can not click your mouse to TV advertisements. It’s againist to your imagine.
    But you can click the links of ads. You can see the content of advertisement at internet. Unfortunately, youtube or facebook includes ripped-off copyrighted materials.

Add Your Comments


Print this Article

More articles from Robert Gorell

Marketing Optimization Blog
FREE Newsletter Sign-Up
send it once every: