<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top &#8220;Dot Bomb&#8221; Era Websites &#8212; Where Are They Now?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grokdotcom.com/index.php/2007/10/09/top-dot-bomb-era-websites-where-are-they-now/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/10/09/top-dot-bomb-era-websites-where-are-they-now/</link>
	<description>Marketing blog focused on marketing optimization, improving website conversion rates, search engine marketing, web analytics, word of mouth, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:38:51 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ian Lamont</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/10/09/top-dot-bomb-era-websites-where-are-they-now/comment-page-1/#comment-255006</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Lamont</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/10/09/top-dot-bomb-era-websites-where-are-they-now/#comment-255006</guid>
		<description>That is an interesting list that you linked to, but note that the methodology is a bit suspect, as several people in the comments pointed out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is an interesting list that you linked to, but note that the methodology is a bit suspect, as several people in the comments pointed out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Insanity Or Conventional Wisdom In Social Networking</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/10/09/top-dot-bomb-era-websites-where-are-they-now/comment-page-1/#comment-244853</link>
		<dc:creator>Insanity Or Conventional Wisdom In Social Networking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/10/09/top-dot-bomb-era-websites-where-are-they-now/#comment-244853</guid>
		<description>[...] touched on the topic yesterday, and Scoble, Dave Winer and the Guardian are debating the concept over at Techmeme. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] touched on the topic yesterday, and Scoble, Dave Winer and the Guardian are debating the concept over at Techmeme. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry F.</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/10/09/top-dot-bomb-era-websites-where-are-they-now/comment-page-1/#comment-244777</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/10/09/top-dot-bomb-era-websites-where-are-they-now/#comment-244777</guid>
		<description>Yes, as long as Google continues to acquire smaller companies with potential such as Kaltix (2003), Ignite Logic (2004), Keyhole, Inc (2004)., Where2 (2004), Urchin Software (2005), Dodgeball (2005), Measure Map (2006), Orion (2006), YouTube (2006), Endoxon (2006), Marratech Video Conferencing Software (2007),  Feed Burner (2007), Peak Stream (2007), Zingku (2007) and most recently, Jaiku, (2007) and more. 

These purchases, among others have no doubt been the reason for the 381% increase since 2001. Take a look at the past purchases, there is a definite relationship between the, demand of searchers to the supply from Google. As long as it (Google) continues to ‘listen’ it will continue growth. Google is moving along at a steady pace, look at the acquisitions and then take a glance in the direction that the average user is looking, Google seems to be one step ahead. 

I wonder what Google founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin think of their creation now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, as long as Google continues to acquire smaller companies with potential such as Kaltix (2003), Ignite Logic (2004), Keyhole, Inc (2004)., Where2 (2004), Urchin Software (2005), Dodgeball (2005), Measure Map (2006), Orion (2006), YouTube (2006), Endoxon (2006), Marratech Video Conferencing Software (2007),  Feed Burner (2007), Peak Stream (2007), Zingku (2007) and most recently, Jaiku, (2007) and more. </p>
<p>These purchases, among others have no doubt been the reason for the 381% increase since 2001. Take a look at the past purchases, there is a definite relationship between the, demand of searchers to the supply from Google. As long as it (Google) continues to ‘listen’ it will continue growth. Google is moving along at a steady pace, look at the acquisitions and then take a glance in the direction that the average user is looking, Google seems to be one step ahead. </p>
<p>I wonder what Google founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin think of their creation now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Harris - alexdesigns.com</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/10/09/top-dot-bomb-era-websites-where-are-they-now/comment-page-1/#comment-243547</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Harris - alexdesigns.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 00:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/10/09/top-dot-bomb-era-websites-where-are-they-now/#comment-243547</guid>
		<description>Yea, I think Google will still be top dog. Today they scooped up Jaiku and they will continue to buy small companies at a discount. Plus Google will be following the success of Facebook applications to move into a better position with Social Networking. Google originally wanted to you to search and leave, now they also want you to be addicted to all their free services for years to come. It will take a lot for another company to get more &quot;attention&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea, I think Google will still be top dog. Today they scooped up Jaiku and they will continue to buy small companies at a discount. Plus Google will be following the success of Facebook applications to move into a better position with Social Networking. Google originally wanted to you to search and leave, now they also want you to be addicted to all their free services for years to come. It will take a lot for another company to get more &#8220;attention&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
