<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 7 Deadly Claims (Part Four) &#8212; &#8220;We&#8217;re #1&#8243;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grokdotcom.com/index.php/2007/12/19/were-number-one/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/12/19/were-number-one/</link>
	<description>Marketing blog focused on marketing optimization, improving website conversion rates, search engine marketing, web analytics, word of mouth, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:19:18 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Power</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/12/19/were-number-one/comment-page-1/#comment-495637</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Power</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 14:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/12/19/were-number-one/#comment-495637</guid>
		<description>People buy because of emotion.  People don&#039;t buy because of the facts.  

If you lose credibility on the fact dimension by claiming &#039;industry leader&#039; or other unsubstantiated claim and don&#039;t satisfy a need, you&#039;re going nowhere fast.   

Avis&#039; #2 campaign simultaneously hit the emotional button with the perfect factoid.   We like underdogs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People buy because of emotion.  People don&#8217;t buy because of the facts.  </p>
<p>If you lose credibility on the fact dimension by claiming &#8216;industry leader&#8217; or other unsubstantiated claim and don&#8217;t satisfy a need, you&#8217;re going nowhere fast.   </p>
<p>Avis&#8217; #2 campaign simultaneously hit the emotional button with the perfect factoid.   We like underdogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Proof In Sales Copy Andrew Cavanagh</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/12/19/were-number-one/comment-page-1/#comment-417815</link>
		<dc:creator>Proof In Sales Copy Andrew Cavanagh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 02:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/12/19/were-number-one/#comment-417815</guid>
		<description>The biggest reason people don&#039;t buy from you is because they simply don&#039;t believe you.

By giving specific proof as Jeff suggests you go a long way towards building that belief necessary to push your prospect over the edge to buy.

If you listen closely to your own conversations how do you talk up a company or a product?

Do you say &quot;I&#039;ve heard it was reviewed in a stack of newspapers&quot; or do you say &quot;I just read an amazing review about it in the Wall St Journal.  Jeff Smith gave it his highest recommendation and he usually pans every product they put on his desk.&quot;

Understanding the way we communicate to real live people one on one is a huge key to understanding how to communicate effectively in a sales letter.

Kindest regards,
Andrew Cavanagh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The biggest reason people don&#8217;t buy from you is because they simply don&#8217;t believe you.</p>
<p>By giving specific proof as Jeff suggests you go a long way towards building that belief necessary to push your prospect over the edge to buy.</p>
<p>If you listen closely to your own conversations how do you talk up a company or a product?</p>
<p>Do you say &#8220;I&#8217;ve heard it was reviewed in a stack of newspapers&#8221; or do you say &#8220;I just read an amazing review about it in the Wall St Journal.  Jeff Smith gave it his highest recommendation and he usually pans every product they put on his desk.&#8221;</p>
<p>Understanding the way we communicate to real live people one on one is a huge key to understanding how to communicate effectively in a sales letter.</p>
<p>Kindest regards,<br />
Andrew Cavanagh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Sexton</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/12/19/were-number-one/comment-page-1/#comment-412507</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Sexton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 22:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/12/19/were-number-one/#comment-412507</guid>
		<description>Thanks for all the great comments.  I agree with the majority of them, and just wanted to say that you can read more about this particular Avis campaign in Ries and Trout&#039; little gem of a book, &lt;i&gt;The 22 Immutable Laws of Marketing.&lt;/i&gt;  

One of my many valuable take-aways from that book is that marketing claims can never successfully violate the audience’s perceived reality.  If readers don&#039;t see you as the “Number 1” in your industry, claiming to be the leader will only cause prospects to reject not only that claim, but your entire marketing message.  Stated in the positive, it&#039;s a simple principle: always acknowledge your readers&#039; reality in your copy!

The #2 campaign by Avis proved effective and memorable not only for it&#039;s audacity, but for it&#039;s clever ability to stop fighting this dynamic and turn it to advantage through an emotional appeal.  In other words, it changed what people felt about Avis position in the market, rather than trying to change what people already thought they knew about Avis.  For more on this technique, see this post on Emotion vs. Logic:

http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/07/12/emotional-perspective-redux/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for all the great comments.  I agree with the majority of them, and just wanted to say that you can read more about this particular Avis campaign in Ries and Trout&#8217; little gem of a book, <i>The 22 Immutable Laws of Marketing.</i>  </p>
<p>One of my many valuable take-aways from that book is that marketing claims can never successfully violate the audience’s perceived reality.  If readers don&#8217;t see you as the “Number 1” in your industry, claiming to be the leader will only cause prospects to reject not only that claim, but your entire marketing message.  Stated in the positive, it&#8217;s a simple principle: always acknowledge your readers&#8217; reality in your copy!</p>
<p>The #2 campaign by Avis proved effective and memorable not only for it&#8217;s audacity, but for it&#8217;s clever ability to stop fighting this dynamic and turn it to advantage through an emotional appeal.  In other words, it changed what people felt about Avis position in the market, rather than trying to change what people already thought they knew about Avis.  For more on this technique, see this post on Emotion vs. Logic:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/07/12/emotional-perspective-redux/">http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/07/12/emotional-perspective-redux/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Wanek</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/12/19/were-number-one/comment-page-1/#comment-408891</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Wanek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 17:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/12/19/were-number-one/#comment-408891</guid>
		<description>Jeff provides excellent examples of how talk can be cheap without adding the corresponding actions or signals to back the claim.

The beauty behind Avis’ original campaign (the first of which ran way back in 1962) was that they had the guts to risk reputation and prestige by revealing themselves as the #2 car rental company in the industry.  It was a risky move since most of us like to associate with a winner.  Avis strengthened the message by giving concrete examples of how they try harder to win our business.

The campaign skyrocketed the unprofitable Avis to the #1 spot over then market leader, Hertz.

But over the years Avis lost it’s way, allowing upstart Enterprise to overtake them as champion of the car rental industry.  Now after four decades of “trying harder”, Avis finds itself once again in the #2 spot, and has gone back to using the &quot;We try harder&quot; pitch in an attempt to regain it’s marketing mojo.  

But it won’t work.  

Why? Because, Avis curiously dropped the &quot;We&#039;re #2&quot; part of the slogan, and with it went all credibility.  As Jeff has been teaching us, without concrete proof of their actions Avis’ claim remains unsubstantiated.
  
Admittedly though, it’s hard to convince the public you’re trying hard enough when after 45 years of effort you’re still #2.  It’s time for Avis to adopt a new strategy.

Sorry for the long post :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff provides excellent examples of how talk can be cheap without adding the corresponding actions or signals to back the claim.</p>
<p>The beauty behind Avis’ original campaign (the first of which ran way back in 1962) was that they had the guts to risk reputation and prestige by revealing themselves as the #2 car rental company in the industry.  It was a risky move since most of us like to associate with a winner.  Avis strengthened the message by giving concrete examples of how they try harder to win our business.</p>
<p>The campaign skyrocketed the unprofitable Avis to the #1 spot over then market leader, Hertz.</p>
<p>But over the years Avis lost it’s way, allowing upstart Enterprise to overtake them as champion of the car rental industry.  Now after four decades of “trying harder”, Avis finds itself once again in the #2 spot, and has gone back to using the &#8220;We try harder&#8221; pitch in an attempt to regain it’s marketing mojo.  </p>
<p>But it won’t work.  </p>
<p>Why? Because, Avis curiously dropped the &#8220;We&#8217;re #2&#8243; part of the slogan, and with it went all credibility.  As Jeff has been teaching us, without concrete proof of their actions Avis’ claim remains unsubstantiated.</p>
<p>Admittedly though, it’s hard to convince the public you’re trying hard enough when after 45 years of effort you’re still #2.  It’s time for Avis to adopt a new strategy.</p>
<p>Sorry for the long post <img src='http://www.grokdotcom.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Eyewriter Waites</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/12/19/were-number-one/comment-page-1/#comment-408811</link>
		<dc:creator>William Eyewriter Waites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 16:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/12/19/were-number-one/#comment-408811</guid>
		<description>Back at the time the &quot;We&#039;re #2&quot; campaign was launched, it had many detractors. But the claim worked both for audacity and for smart strategy. There were then several car rental firms that could be described as Hertz and all others. The Avis campaign raised that company out of the all others category, creating an industry of Hertz, Avis and all others. My recollection is that Avis never exceeded Hertz in market share, although the campaign/claim was irritant enough to Hertz that they actually ran ads disputing Avis&#039; service claims and thereby raising Avis awareness and saliency even more. But beating Hertz was not the original objective for Avis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back at the time the &#8220;We&#8217;re #2&#8243; campaign was launched, it had many detractors. But the claim worked both for audacity and for smart strategy. There were then several car rental firms that could be described as Hertz and all others. The Avis campaign raised that company out of the all others category, creating an industry of Hertz, Avis and all others. My recollection is that Avis never exceeded Hertz in market share, although the campaign/claim was irritant enough to Hertz that they actually ran ads disputing Avis&#8217; service claims and thereby raising Avis awareness and saliency even more. But beating Hertz was not the original objective for Avis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/12/19/were-number-one/comment-page-1/#comment-400380</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 02:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/12/19/were-number-one/#comment-400380</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a big fan of the Avis claim, and have mentioned it in the blog a few times, including my first post in the series: 

http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/11/26/superior-customer-service/

Much of its power comes from the fact that it has the bold audacity to go directly against one of the Seven Deadly Claims.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a big fan of the Avis claim, and have mentioned it in the blog a few times, including my first post in the series: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/11/26/superior-customer-service/">http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/11/26/superior-customer-service/</a></p>
<p>Much of its power comes from the fact that it has the bold audacity to go directly against one of the Seven Deadly Claims.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Small Business Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/12/19/were-number-one/comment-page-1/#comment-400368</link>
		<dc:creator>Small Business Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 02:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/12/19/were-number-one/#comment-400368</guid>
		<description>What about: &quot;We&#039;re #2.  We try harder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about: &#8220;We&#8217;re #2.  We try harder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
