Salesmanship is about transferring confidence, and you can’t inspire confidence without first establishing your credibility. So when it comes to Landing Page copy, credibility is truly Job #1.Here are five must-haves for building that credibility where it often counts the most:
1. Scent
They’re called landing pages because they’re where you plan for visitors to “land” after clicking through on PPC and targeted search terms. So before you do anything else, convince those visitors they’ve come to the right place by prominently featuring their “trigger” or search terms on the page.
For instance, if you’re paying for “Monster Truck” clicks, make sure your headline includes the phrase “Monster Trucks.” Having pictures of those same kind of trucks wouldn’t hurt either. Simply improving your landing page’s scent can improve sales success by multiples when compared to pages that don’t include the appropriate trigger words/scent.Bottom line: if visitors can’t verify that your site has what they came looking for within 5-7 seconds, you’ll have already lost their confidence.
2. Transparency
While only a (relatively) recent buzzword, the use of transparency to drive credibility is as old as salesmanship itself. In fact, check out these sales letter excerpts from Robert Collier’s Million Dollar Sales Letters:
“790 Leftover Ulsters At A Big Discount!Dear Sir:In the rush and excitement of selling, in the past two months, of 21,000 “Keep Warm” Winter Ulsters - there was no time to pay attention to exactly how sizes and colors were running.The result is that now, with the season near its end, we find ourselves with 790 coats left over - in all sizes - BUT WITHOUT A COMPLETE RANGE OF SIZES IN ANY ONE COLOR!There are dark grays and blues and beautiful brown heather-mixtures, in Greatcoats that we sold in the past all the way up to $47.00 - really handsome colors, all of them - but we can’t be sure of having your exact size in the color you specify.”
And for a modern update on that, check out Roy William’s brilliant bit of web copy for vactionlikekings.com:
“You’ve seen the condos in Myrtle Beach that overlook the ocean.Rich people own those. And when they’re not using them, we rent them out to nice families like yours for about the same prices you’ve been paying for hotel rooms.Put yourself in their shoes.The condo is paid for and empty.Why not let it generate a few bucks?Now put yourself in their condo.We’re Condotels. Our job is to welcome you upon your arrival in Myrtle Beach and hand you the keys to your luxury condo. It’s as easy as staying in a hotel. But better. A lot better. VacationLikeKings.com”
What you’ll find in both excerpts is a skillful use of transparency. The copy very quickly tells the reader WHY the company is able to offer them such a good deal. It’s not enough just to say what’s in it for the reader, because compelling offers will inevitably raise the questions: “Yeah, but how can they do that? What’s in it for them?”
Notice how the first letter also does a fabulous job of raising the downside as a means of lending credibility to the upside. The very fact that not all colors are available in all sizes lends legitimacy to the “left over stock” explanation.*People are rightfully cynical. They want to know all the angles. Provide that to them through a transparent explanation. Once they believe your explanation, they’ll have gained a world of confidence in your offer.
3. Specificity
Specifics force themselves into the reader’s imagination while generalities remain handcuffed to the hard-nosed intellect. Engaging the imagination more easily creates emotions, like confidence. This is called the vividness effect and it’s why specifics are more believable then generalities.
Dan and Chip Heath provide an excellent, specific example of this in their book, Made to Stick. They cite psychological research wherein two groups of jurors where presented with eight arguments fore and against a mother accused of parental neglect.The difference between the two groups was the level of detail in those arguments. One group, heard supporting arguments with vivid detail and arguments against the mother’s fitness that were unadorned with any extra details. The other group heard the opposite combination.
As an example of the kind of vivid details included or left out of the arguments, the book provides the following:
“…An argument against Mrs. Johnson was: ‘The child went to school with a badly scraped arm which Mrs. Johnson had not cleaned or attended to. The school nurse had to clean the scrape.’ The vivid form added the detail that, as the nurse was cleaning the scrape, she spilled Mercurochrome on herself, staining the uniform red.The researchers carefully tested the arguments with and without vivid details to ensure that they had the same perceived importance – the details were designed to be irrelevant to the judgment of Mrs. Johnson’s worthiness. It mattered that Mrs. Johnson didn’t attend to the scraped arm; it didn’t matter that the nurse’s uniform got stained in the process.”
And the results? On average 1.5 more jurors (out of 10) voted for the arguments with the irrelevant details than the arguments without them. We’re talking about a 15% increase in “conversion” – just from the inclusion of a few irrelevant specifics. Now imagine the impact of relevant, specific details to your copy’s credibility.
4. Proof
Proof overlaps a bit with Transparency and Specifics, but it’s an all-important aspect of confidence-building. In fact, it’s so important, I wrote a series of posts on how to transform un-substantiate claims into confidence-inspiring proof.Here’s a quick summary:
5. Readability
We do indeed come from a “fragmented MTV rap video culture,” causing us to flee the mere prospect of having to read dense blocks of text. And that goes double for overly complex or jargon-filled text. This makes the readability of your landing pages crucial. And I’d break that down into two aspects:
So there you have it. Cover those 5 bases and you’ll effectively transfer your confidence to your landing page’s readers – and be able to measure the difference in both your conversion rate and your wallet.
* Of course, the company may not have been truly transparent (they may have had plenty of colors in all sizes and just been itching to sell coats off-season), but the simulation of a full disclosure was enough to inspire confidence. That said, in today’s world of hyper-connectivity, I’d suggest you stick with genuine (vs. simulated) transparency. Editor’s Note: For more tips on increasing your landing page trust and credibility, sign up for our free webinar later today at 12pm EST.
July 9th, 2008
8:17 pm
Thanks for the tips they are very useful in my type of industry!
July 10th, 2008
6:48 am
For many young companies the proof is always the difficult part. Client testimonials - if you have them - will do part of the job for you but often you will need some factual evidence. I’ve found quoting what other sites say about the product/your brand in these instances is really helpful for conversions - just foot note it and place the link in the footnotes at the bottom of the page. Your reader should have passed a number of calls to action by this stage and is unlikely to ‘leak’ to another site. And those who do click on it often return to your site having had your claims backed up.
July 10th, 2008
7:39 am
Great advice, Mike,
Allowing visitors to verify outside awards or recommendations for themselves definitely ups the credibility factor.
I would simply make a distinction between factual evidence and factual claims. A young company may not have the history to claim 98% customer satisfaction and only a 1% turnover rate in support of their customer service, but the newest of companies can promise to answer your support call within 8 rings. Or to arrive within the exact hour of your scheduled service call.
Those are examples of factual - as in falsifiable – claims. And as long as the company answers the “or what?” question, they can serve as a form of credibility building proof. “We’ll show up within the exact hour we say we will, or your service call is free – whatever repairs you need are on us.” By putting their money on the line in answering the “or what” question, that young company added a truckload of credibility to their claims of superior customer service.
-Jeff
July 10th, 2008
8:08 am
6. Good Grammar?
Sorry to nitpick but I find misuse of apostrophes a huge turnoff - surely it should be ‘keys to landing page credibility’
(says a complete conversion rate beginner!
)
July 10th, 2008
1:04 pm
I’m with Pashmina… I thought this must be a gag header with that glaring typo! Derailed me right off the ‘credibility train’ re: the article, which I’ll go back to after I recover from the in-your-face snafu. Contact me if you’d like to hire an editor…
July 10th, 2008
8:08 pm
Laurie and Pashmina,
Yup, that was a pretty glaring error. We’ve interrupted our normal editing routine and I guess it shows! Back to basics for me
Thanks for the heads up.
-Jeff
July 11th, 2008
2:03 am
I think I’m guilty of at least one of those. It sounds like I need to add some <p>’s to my sales letter.
Maybe I need to rewrite the whole thing actually now that I think about it.. that site is pretty dead and needs a revival.
July 14th, 2008
11:14 am
Landing Page Credibility and a Good Clean Example…
I have a bit of a crisis to deal with and need to leave today so here are 5 Copywriting Keys to Landing Page Credibility a good clean landing page example.
……
July 14th, 2008
11:37 am
Another great article, Jeff. I always read yours when they are featured on Grok.com.
While you are swatting at nits, you may as well change “fore” to “for” in “eight arguments fore and against” (section 3, paragraph 2). It “brought me to the surface” instead of keeping me in the flow of your piece.
Your advice on readability is spot on.
July 15th, 2008
9:46 am
Well done. Useful.
August 22nd, 2008
11:47 am
Thanks, Jeff that’s a very useful article
(I found you via a link on Small Business SEM)
I found the section on Transparency particularly useful, and it’s one that’s often not covered in other articles/guides but can really add to the sense that the reader is interacting with a real person, not just another spin-doctor!
Cheers, Jon