<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It Ain&#8217;t About the Technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grokdotcom.com/index.php/2009/01/15/it-aint-about-the-technology/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2009/01/15/it-aint-about-the-technology/</link>
	<description>Marketing blog focused on marketing optimization, improving website conversion rates, search engine marketing, web analytics, word of mouth, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:15:29 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Property Management Software</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2009/01/15/it-aint-about-the-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-1181830</link>
		<dc:creator>Property Management Software</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 14:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/?p=2648#comment-1181830</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t seem to bring myself to jump on the twitter bandwagon.  Anybody remember the days before cell phones when everybody didn&#039;t know everybody else&#039;s business realtime?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t seem to bring myself to jump on the twitter bandwagon.  Anybody remember the days before cell phones when everybody didn&#8217;t know everybody else&#8217;s business realtime?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mind your networking manners &#171; Media Update - The Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2009/01/15/it-aint-about-the-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-1138411</link>
		<dc:creator>Mind your networking manners &#171; Media Update - The Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 11:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/?p=2648#comment-1138411</guid>
		<description>[...] Sexton explains this well in his article – stating there is no need to ‘understand’ the rules of social media; we merely need to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sexton explains this well in his article – stating there is no need to ‘understand’ the rules of social media; we merely need to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant M. Waldman</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2009/01/15/it-aint-about-the-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-1136073</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant M. Waldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/?p=2648#comment-1136073</guid>
		<description>Very true!  Social networking is a great way to communicate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very true!  Social networking is a great way to communicate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2009/01/15/it-aint-about-the-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-1135787</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/?p=2648#comment-1135787</guid>
		<description>Kathleen, 

The analogy isn’t perfect, but it is useful in showing the kinds of tweets that most people would appreciate – they are roughly the same kind things that your officemates would like tossed out as an observation, comment, “check this out” heads-up, etc.  

And knowing that is essential to understanding the difference between one’s tweets being “about me” and being about “what I’m doing.”  Frankly, most of us don’t have a cult of personality.  So unless your twitter followers are limited to only your close personal friends, tweets about you are probably more clutter than anything.  

But taken at a higher perspective than the prosaic and literal, tweets about what you’re doing ARE interesting to a large number of people.  I may not care to receive a tweet saying that you’re frustrated, or that you’re working on a PR piece for a client, but I might find a comment about a recurrent client communication frustration that you have fascinating. 

Chances are that the 12 non-acquaintances who follow you are doing so because they are interested in your thoughts and insights.  By picturing them working at a cubicle next to you, you can get a better idea about what would be worth tweeting to them and what may be viewed as distracting &quot;noise.&quot;  What your twitter followers learn “about you” should primarily be learned by hearing a particular “voice” and point of view behind your thoughts - not from receiving half-hourly updates on your life.  

More directly, while you don’t have to tailor your tweets to a specific audience, it does help to realize that you are broadcasting these things out to an audience, and I find my cubicle analogy helps me picture that and to keep in mind that, “it’s not about me.”  I just wanted to pass the technique along to my readers.

- Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kathleen, </p>
<p>The analogy isn’t perfect, but it is useful in showing the kinds of tweets that most people would appreciate – they are roughly the same kind things that your officemates would like tossed out as an observation, comment, “check this out” heads-up, etc.  </p>
<p>And knowing that is essential to understanding the difference between one’s tweets being “about me” and being about “what I’m doing.”  Frankly, most of us don’t have a cult of personality.  So unless your twitter followers are limited to only your close personal friends, tweets about you are probably more clutter than anything.  </p>
<p>But taken at a higher perspective than the prosaic and literal, tweets about what you’re doing ARE interesting to a large number of people.  I may not care to receive a tweet saying that you’re frustrated, or that you’re working on a PR piece for a client, but I might find a comment about a recurrent client communication frustration that you have fascinating. </p>
<p>Chances are that the 12 non-acquaintances who follow you are doing so because they are interested in your thoughts and insights.  By picturing them working at a cubicle next to you, you can get a better idea about what would be worth tweeting to them and what may be viewed as distracting &#8220;noise.&#8221;  What your twitter followers learn “about you” should primarily be learned by hearing a particular “voice” and point of view behind your thoughts &#8211; not from receiving half-hourly updates on your life.  </p>
<p>More directly, while you don’t have to tailor your tweets to a specific audience, it does help to realize that you are broadcasting these things out to an audience, and I find my cubicle analogy helps me picture that and to keep in mind that, “it’s not about me.”  I just wanted to pass the technique along to my readers.</p>
<p>- Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathleen Hanover</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2009/01/15/it-aint-about-the-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-1135764</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen Hanover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/?p=2648#comment-1135764</guid>
		<description>Granted, I&#039;m a Twitter newbie, but Jeff, your metaphor doesn&#039;t hold up. One cannot choose ones&#039; cube neighbors (and thus the conversations one overhears), but following me or not following me on Twitter is entirely your choice. I don&#039;t feel obligated to tailor my tweets to your taste. Frankly, they&#039;re about me and what I&#039;m doing. If what I&#039;m working on doesn&#039;t interest you, then don&#039;t follow me.  :)  I have 16 followers at the moment, and I only know two of them personally. How the others found me an decided I was fascinating enough to follow, I have no idea. And even if I wanted to tailor my tweets to these strangers, how would I go about it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Granted, I&#8217;m a Twitter newbie, but Jeff, your metaphor doesn&#8217;t hold up. One cannot choose ones&#8217; cube neighbors (and thus the conversations one overhears), but following me or not following me on Twitter is entirely your choice. I don&#8217;t feel obligated to tailor my tweets to your taste. Frankly, they&#8217;re about me and what I&#8217;m doing. If what I&#8217;m working on doesn&#8217;t interest you, then don&#8217;t follow me.  <img src='http://www.grokdotcom.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   I have 16 followers at the moment, and I only know two of them personally. How the others found me an decided I was fascinating enough to follow, I have no idea. And even if I wanted to tailor my tweets to these strangers, how would I go about it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2009/01/15/it-aint-about-the-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-1135550</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 01:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/?p=2648#comment-1135550</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a great point, John.  I agree that the &quot;What are you doing&quot; prompt leads people in the wrong direction.  You friends line is great, but I think it relies too heavily on the &quot;that I might be interested in&quot; part to turn the first phrase into an honest invitation rather than a snarky comment.  Something similar to that phrase or its general spirit would definitely be an improvement over what Twitter is currently using.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a great point, John.  I agree that the &#8220;What are you doing&#8221; prompt leads people in the wrong direction.  You friends line is great, but I think it relies too heavily on the &#8220;that I might be interested in&#8221; part to turn the first phrase into an honest invitation rather than a snarky comment.  Something similar to that phrase or its general spirit would definitely be an improvement over what Twitter is currently using.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2009/01/15/it-aint-about-the-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-1135108</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 20:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/?p=2648#comment-1135108</guid>
		<description>Jeff - maybe you should talk to Twitter and have them remove the voyeur tag line &quot;What are you doing&quot;.  A friend&#039;s favorite line that he tries to put in conversation when possible is &quot;tell me something I don&#039;t know (that I might be interested in)&quot;.  But Twitter using that line might lose them 90% of their business, eh wot?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff &#8211; maybe you should talk to Twitter and have them remove the voyeur tag line &#8220;What are you doing&#8221;.  A friend&#8217;s favorite line that he tries to put in conversation when possible is &#8220;tell me something I don&#8217;t know (that I might be interested in)&#8221;.  But Twitter using that line might lose them 90% of their business, eh wot?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fearlessly Stupid</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2009/01/15/it-aint-about-the-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-1133287</link>
		<dc:creator>Fearlessly Stupid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 19:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/?p=2648#comment-1133287</guid>
		<description>JS ... Isn&#039;t TWIT the root word of TWITTER?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JS &#8230; Isn&#8217;t TWIT the root word of TWITTER?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meryl K. Evans</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2009/01/15/it-aint-about-the-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-1133281</link>
		<dc:creator>Meryl K. Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/?p=2648#comment-1133281</guid>
		<description>That makes sense, Jeff. People don&#039;t really notice you unfollowing them (unless they have fewer than 100 followers). @redcrew also mentioned http://twalala.com as another option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That makes sense, Jeff. People don&#8217;t really notice you unfollowing them (unless they have fewer than 100 followers). @redcrew also mentioned <a href="http://twalala.com">http://twalala.com</a> as another option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2009/01/15/it-aint-about-the-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-1133278</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/?p=2648#comment-1133278</guid>
		<description>Meryl,

Thank you so very much for the tool - that&#039;s awesome.  To answer your question, I wanted to follow this person based on a small sampling of comments, which were good, but I had no idea how prolific he/she was and how many of those tweets would be more noise than signal.  That said, I don&#039;t want to offend the person because I think relatively highly of them.  I just don&#039;t want to listen to all the chatter.

Hope that explains it.  And thanks again for the tool.  Thank Joanna, too

- Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meryl,</p>
<p>Thank you so very much for the tool &#8211; that&#8217;s awesome.  To answer your question, I wanted to follow this person based on a small sampling of comments, which were good, but I had no idea how prolific he/she was and how many of those tweets would be more noise than signal.  That said, I don&#8217;t want to offend the person because I think relatively highly of them.  I just don&#8217;t want to listen to all the chatter.</p>
<p>Hope that explains it.  And thanks again for the tool.  Thank Joanna, too</p>
<p>- Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Hydzik</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2009/01/15/it-aint-about-the-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-1133259</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Hydzik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/?p=2648#comment-1133259</guid>
		<description>The technologies that thrive are the ones that serve our human side. It&#039;s about people, not technology. Wish I had a dime for every time I&#039;ve had to remind my clients and students about that one. Thanks, Jeff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The technologies that thrive are the ones that serve our human side. It&#8217;s about people, not technology. Wish I had a dime for every time I&#8217;ve had to remind my clients and students about that one. Thanks, Jeff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meryl K. Evans</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2009/01/15/it-aint-about-the-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-1133249</link>
		<dc:creator>Meryl K. Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/?p=2648#comment-1133249</guid>
		<description>Thanks to @joannayoung, try http://twittersnooze.com/.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to @joannayoung, try <a href="http://twittersnooze.com/.">http://twittersnooze.com/.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meryl K. Evans</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2009/01/15/it-aint-about-the-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-1133244</link>
		<dc:creator>Meryl K. Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 15:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/?p=2648#comment-1133244</guid>
		<description>Jeff, why follow a person if you don&#039;t want to read their tweets? I remember reading about something that can do this -- but I can&#039;t for the life of me find it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff, why follow a person if you don&#8217;t want to read their tweets? I remember reading about something that can do this &#8212; but I can&#8217;t for the life of me find it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MHB</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2009/01/15/it-aint-about-the-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-1132499</link>
		<dc:creator>MHB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 00:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/?p=2648#comment-1132499</guid>
		<description>agreed, great parsing Jon.  i do worry that too much time is spent in the industry understanding people&#039;s relationships with technology, and too little time aiming to understand people themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agreed, great parsing Jon.  i do worry that too much time is spent in the industry understanding people&#8217;s relationships with technology, and too little time aiming to understand people themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2009/01/15/it-aint-about-the-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-1132404</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/?p=2648#comment-1132404</guid>
		<description>Jon,

I couldn&#039;t agree with you more.  By the way, is there a way to block someone&#039;s tweets without having them know their tweets are being blocked (i.e., without offending them)?

- Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon,</p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree with you more.  By the way, is there a way to block someone&#8217;s tweets without having them know their tweets are being blocked (i.e., without offending them)?</p>
<p>- Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florida</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2009/01/15/it-aint-about-the-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-1132391</link>
		<dc:creator>Florida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/?p=2648#comment-1132391</guid>
		<description>Speaking of technology and twitter, I&#039;ve seen just about every possible twitter API usage you can think of. There are two websites devoted purely to just listing the other sites that use their API.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of technology and twitter, I&#8217;ve seen just about every possible twitter API usage you can think of. There are two websites devoted purely to just listing the other sites that use their API.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Stamoulis</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2009/01/15/it-aint-about-the-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-1132369</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Stamoulis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/?p=2648#comment-1132369</guid>
		<description>It is def. important to always add something educated and useful to a group conversation otherwise you could get shunned by the group.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is def. important to always add something educated and useful to a group conversation otherwise you could get shunned by the group.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Bischke</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2009/01/15/it-aint-about-the-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-1132172</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Bischke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 05:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/?p=2648#comment-1132172</guid>
		<description>I tend to play very close attention to the signal-to-noise ratio of the people I follow.  They may post something good every now and then but if it&#039;s interspersed between 10 posts about their dog then it&#039;s just not worth it to follow them.  Likewise I&#039;ve tried to be more conscious lately of providing as much value as I can through my stream.  

Incidentally, @jonbischke if you&#039;d like to follow! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to play very close attention to the signal-to-noise ratio of the people I follow.  They may post something good every now and then but if it&#8217;s interspersed between 10 posts about their dog then it&#8217;s just not worth it to follow them.  Likewise I&#8217;ve tried to be more conscious lately of providing as much value as I can through my stream.  </p>
<p>Incidentally, @jonbischke if you&#8217;d like to follow! <img src='http://www.grokdotcom.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conficker</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2009/01/15/it-aint-about-the-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-1132155</link>
		<dc:creator>Conficker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 04:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/?p=2648#comment-1132155</guid>
		<description>At first I hated Twitter, and now I&#039;m not so opposed to it. I&#039;ve created like 5 accounts just to reserve my name and wife, and a couple others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At first I hated Twitter, and now I&#8217;m not so opposed to it. I&#8217;ve created like 5 accounts just to reserve my name and wife, and a couple others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inspired Living</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2009/01/15/it-aint-about-the-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-1132124</link>
		<dc:creator>Inspired Living</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 02:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/?p=2648#comment-1132124</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this, I hadn&#039;t considered using the network until you mentioned it. Looks great!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this, I hadn&#8217;t considered using the network until you mentioned it. Looks great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
