Is American Idol’s newest judge an attempt to cover all 4 temperaments and create the natural dynamic that comes with that?
According to the American Idol Website:
“We had originally intended for American Idol to have four judges,” said executive producer Cecile Frot-Coutaz. “We’ve seen from our international series that having a fourth judge creates a dynamic that benefits both the contestants and the viewers.”
Of course, this just means they wanted 4 judges, and not necessarily that they wanted the judges to line up with the 4 temperaments. But when you look at the roles and personalities of the judges, the overlay with the temperaments is intriguing.
Simon Cowell is the NT/Competitive/Rational. He’s very much to the point and focused on the bottom line. Speaking the truth is more important than sparing a contestant’s feelings. Simon thoroughly embodies the rational/thinking approach to judging vs. Paula’s feeling and empathy-heavy perspective.
Paula is certainly an NF. She’s concerned with the performer’s feelings. She wants to empathize with their situation. She wants to be as inclusive as possible, and she sees no reason to put too fine a point on negative feedback. She often finds Simon to be deliberately cruel.
Randy is high Sensing and more than likely an SP/Spontaneous/Artisan. Randy almost always comments on how the singer actually sounded. He frequently comments on “pitch problems” or the dynamic range of the song/vocalist. And he’s also most likely to comment on how the song made him feel, not in a Paula/introspective way, but in a “that was hot” or a “it was just kind of alright for me” way. This is Spontaneous speak – very in the moment and sensing.
And that leaves one temperament missing.
Enter Kara DiaGuardi. Now I haven’t watched as much of this season and have seen precious little of Kara, so this is purely speculative and tentative, but here’s what makes me think that Kara’s probably a Methodical:
So there you have it. Obviously, it’s early in the season and my assertions are purely speculative about Kara, but I’d say it’s no accident that Kara’s stage persona has so far shaped up to fill the missing temperament from the Randy-Paula-Simon trio.
Hat top to Mark Fox for asking me this question and sparking the idea for the article.
March 20th, 2009
11:02 am
I love Kara!
March 20th, 2009
4:19 pm
[...] Random Feed wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptIs American Idol’s newest judge an attempt to cover all 4 temperaments and create the natural dynamic that comes with that? According to the American Idol Website : “We had originally intended for American Idol to have four judges,” said executive producer Cecile Frot-Coutaz. “We’ve seen from our international series that having a fourth judge creates a dynamic that benefits both the contestants and the viewers.” Of course, this just means they wanted 4 judges, and not necessarily tha [...]
March 21st, 2009
1:06 am
So check it out Jeff, this blog was just kinda OK for me dog, not one of your best, but you made it your own
March 22nd, 2009
10:43 am
[...] 22, 2009 by Karen So I hadn’t thought about it, but someone has suggested that the addition of Kara to the Idol panel was about ensuring that all four temperaments were covered. (I didn’t realize that slutty and unhelpful was the missing key to a show that was already [...]
March 22nd, 2009
6:35 pm
Idols is a Dutch product from John the Mol. Just like Big Brother people talk about it. No matter who wins, its just fun.
March 24th, 2009
4:59 pm
And all along I just thought Paula was a drunk and Simon was an a-hole… Dawg, pitch on, just not enough tang in the oj bro.
March 25th, 2009
9:00 am
Jeff, I wonder if that was necessary since the dominant temperament of America is SJ. They’ve actually been the 4th judge all along. Interesting analysis though.
March 26th, 2009
11:41 am
Intriguing thought, Manley,
The Audience has been the 4th Judge, and there is a enough of an SJ slant to our culture and population to make your generalization plausible. That’s probably why the 3 judges alone has worked so well to date.
But apart from the stage audience booing Simon, the wider audience simple doesn’t interact with the other judges during the show. I think the producers were looking for a dynamic to evolve between the judges that would have all 4 temperaments represented (and voiced) at the judges table.
- Jeff
March 26th, 2009
3:50 pm
I learned through the Wizard about the 4 Gospels, and the Star Trek characters, but this is brilliant.
April 27th, 2009
8:11 am
[...] How many people craft different blog posts tackling the same subject from different angles and designed to appeal to different Temperaments? [...]
April 27th, 2009
8:23 am
[...] How many people craft different blog posts tackling the same subject from different angles and designed to appeal to different… [...]
May 28th, 2009
9:08 am
How about Ryan Seacrest the host? What can you say about him?
August 16th, 2009
1:08 pm
I’m not impressed with the 4th judge idea. 3 was perfect, 4 is too much. And I agree that Seacrest has an impact as well with his own personality.
October 28th, 2009
6:47 pm
That’s great.