As weird as it sounds, it’s the norm for businesses with sales cycles that might be as long as several months to a year and that might involve multiple decision makers and influencers to utterly fail to take these factors into consideration when constructing their website or selecting an analytics package.
In fact, whenever I work with B2B and complex sales clients it’s a sure bet their website won’t:
If a sales manager needs to justify a training expense to his CEO and CFO, wouldn’t it help to provide your inside champion with messaging and tools to help him make his (read “your”) case?
It’s usually good to have sections of your website and messaging designed specifically for those secondary decision-makers and influencers that need to sign-off on the decision of your inside champion. As an analogy to the consumer world, would you really want to construct a website that sells engagement rings without providing content and messaging for the prospective fiancee?
To keep with the consumer analogy, let’s say you’re considering having a pool put into your back yard. Assuming that one of your local pool suppliers/installers had a website with valuable early and middle stage content, how many times might you visit their website before actually contacting them and becoming a lead?
Needless to say, the exact same patterns of behavior occur for B2B sites as well. And yet most B2B sites don’t have defined content and conversion points for their early and middle stage visitors. Your prospective leads are going to go somewhere to get their questions answered, shouldn’t it be on your website not your competitors?
While early and middle stage conversion points help a Web analyst/website optimizer get a better handle on a sites overall success in engaging early and middle stage buyers, it still leaves them guessing at the big picture, simply because they can’t track a lead generation or sale all the way back to that prospect’s first visit to the Website. This can be crucial for gauging the real success of a PPC campaign. Key words that might look unprofitable (because they target earlier stage buyers) might be spectacularly profitable – but only after the 8th (or 20th) visit to the site. Unfortunately, if you can’t track visitor behavior over multiple visits, it’s difficult to get a handle on real – vs. false- measures of keyword performance.
While I love, love, love Google Analytics / Google Ad Words, this is exactly one of these tools shortcomings. And it’s one reason that we insist that our OnTarget clients install our software in addition to GA/GWO: OnTarget can bracket visitor behavior through keyword entry and track individual visit behavior over multiple visits. It’s a wish-list come true for us Future Now Persuasion Architects and can be a positive boon for our On Target clients.
So there you have it: start matching your B2B and complex sale website to the real complexity of your sale. I’ll be writing follow-up posts with exercises and steps on how to do this, but in the meantime, would it be too forward of me to suggest you sign up for On Target?
April 21st, 2009
8:43 pm
Great post Jeff. I work on two sites, one of which is a B2B complex sale site. The marketers have a bizarre idea that we put up an adwords campaign, send the single person decision maker to a page, gather a lead and close the sale. The reality is of course weeks or months of research and committees, etc, before they even talk to a single vendor. Slowing moving them over to considering different audiences at different buying stages, but it’s a long cultural change.
April 21st, 2009
9:44 pm
Good pool example, Jeff.
I describe the mini-goals as “stepping stones” for visitors who aren’t ready to jump across the river in one big leap. The difference is that you need to allow the visitor to jump to the other bank from any stone and to take the stones in her own order.
When it comes to optimising each stone you need a better tool than GA.
April 22nd, 2009
12:31 am
These are great points that every website owner and designer should think about.
With so many emerging technologies it can be hard for everyone to keep up with the latest and best ways to interact with their visitors.
April 22nd, 2009
8:12 pm
Great article, however I would argue that it’s the business and not the website that needs to handle the complexity of the sale.
If you’ve got sales processes that take up to a year then you’ve inevitably got a whole range of interactions from personal meetings, conference calls etc that come into play.
Laying the responsibility for the sale solely at the feet of the website, I think, is limiting.
It may prevent companies from addressing other areas that impact on the final sale.
April 22nd, 2009
8:18 pm
Mark,
Thanks for the comments, and I quite agree with you. I guess I missed my mark in expressing the point. The point is that if a sale takes several months to complete from the time that someone actually identifies themselves as a lead, there are likely several months (or more) in which they are a potential and unidentified lead. So websites should take those pre-lead-form-completion months as seriously as possible.
Of course, once a lead form has been completed, then it’s time for the sales force to carry the ball across the goal line. No question on that one.
What clients have often experienced, however, is that a properly constructed website can dramatically shorten the post-lead sales cycle. In fact, while most lead-gen clients start out with a primary goal of simply getting more leads, most of them benefit far more from getting better qualified and quicker-to-sign leads.
- Jeff
April 26th, 2009
2:11 pm
Do you recommend using wordpress for a platform for a retail site? Are there any themes that you like particularly? I am contemplating wordpress, but can’t seem to find a good theme with product detail/review pages…
April 27th, 2009
1:23 pm
Jeff, I think you have hit the point exactly. The website needs to have CONTENT to support all of the “pre-lead” activity by multiple sources (yes, this is the responsibility of marketing to provide the right content for the various stages of looking before buying), and without the analytics to be able to determine what adwords, content appealed to which prospects at which stage of the buying funnel, then marketing is missing a key ingredient in maximizing the utilization of that website.
April 30th, 2009
12:56 pm
[...] good illustration of this is given in Can your Website Handle the Complexity of your Sale? on FutureNow’s Marketing Optimization Blog. It suggests, rightly, that the minimum your [...]
May 29th, 2009
9:58 am
I think l’ll let web designer maximise the space
July 18th, 2009
10:14 pm
Why I can’t sell out our products from our website.
August 24th, 2009
12:02 pm
Great info thanks Geff – on our holiday rentals price comparison site we take the user all the way through on our site and at the very last moment move them to book on the agents site . Get a higher conversion rate that way.
September 2nd, 2009
3:21 pm
[...] course, Amazon offering this for computers or big-screen TV’s – complex, high-priced purchases – is very different than offering this with books or digital downloads. But, it begs the [...]
September 23rd, 2009
4:06 am
Interesting post Jeff, I agree with Mark that a website doesn’t necessarily handle an entire sale, especially a complex one.
October 9th, 2009
12:33 am
OK I will call to my cutomers who leave a cart in sell process.
October 10th, 2009
1:02 pm
Analytics has become an integral part of business websites.Besides breaking a large process of conversion in several small parts also helps.
October 11th, 2009
1:43 am
I use statCounter for almost my webs. but if it’s a landing page for PPC program,i must do more scripts to track all keywords for more infomation…
October 25th, 2009
10:43 pm
I agree with mark’s perspective and I love Google Analytics too.
October 28th, 2009
6:35 pm
This article definitely helped me to realize some of the things I’ve been doing wrong.
October 29th, 2009
10:42 pm
Nice Tip.
October 30th, 2009
5:11 pm
My website can handle the complexity!