Most companies measure keyword performance – and especially PPC keyword performance – based on one factor: did that word or phrase bring converting visitors to the site on the visit in which they converted.
So the natural thing to do is trim non-performing words and phrases in order to increase the efficiency of your PPC spend. And that’s exactly what one client did, except rather than increasing his efficiency, he dropped his sales by 30%.
Why?
Because, depending on what you sell, lots of people buy on their second, third, or umpteenth visit to your site, rather than the first visit. Those visitors are building confidence in you as they move through their buying process. But most systems don’t (or can’t) track user behavior over multiple visits. So when those early and middle buying-stage keywords shown up as non-converters, they get cut.
The shame is that not everyone is able to track the following sales drop off, which may not occur for days, weeks, or months, back to the act of cutting those keywords.
Would you trade Dennis Rodman for non-performance? Of course not, right? Rodman’s defensive stats alone tell the tale. At his prime, Dennis was pulling down a truly astonishing 18.7 rebounds per game. For reference, the previous year’s league leader in rebounds (David Robinson) averaged 13 per game.
But if the only stats you looked at involved scoring, you’d get a different picture. Comparing Rodman’s 8-9 points per game against other star players’ 20 or more points per game, you’d likely have been misled into trading Rodman, only to find yourself wondering why you started losing games and everyone else’s scoring stats went up against your team.
Think of your assisting keywords terms as the Dennis Rodman’s of your PPC campaign, except you’ll get all the assists and none of the off-court shenanigan’s.
A recent eConsultancy post discusses how Google’s default window for tracking cookies can distort traffic data. Left in its default cookie window setting, Google Analytics (GA) will classify visitors as “search”-driven traffic for six months following a single search based click through to your site – regardless of how they got to your site previous to that search or how they might arrive at your site following that search. Here’s an example of how this might skew your results:
Let’s say you’re driving traffic to your site via radio ads and that a listener, after hearing your ad, types your url directly into his browser. Later, he comes back but this time, he types your business name into Google and clicks through on a displayed search result. Following that, he visits your site three more times via bookmark or directly typing your URL into his site. That’s a total of 5 visits.
Question: How many of those visits would GA classify as search-driven?
Answer: 4 out of 5.
GA would count the first search-based visit and then all of the remaining 3 visits, despite the fact that the following three visits didn’t use search and may have taken place several months after the initial search. Multiply that by all your visitors/visits, and you can see how your understanding of what drives traffic to your website might be distorted in favor of search. And under the impression that your traffic was mostly generated by search and not, say, your radio ads, you might be tempted to cut them from your ad spend. Obviously, the same thing could apply with e-mail campaigns, magazine ads, etc.
Any experienced Web Analyst or Website Optimizer could extend this list of “gotchas” and “classic mistakes” almost indefinitely. It’s just not that uncommon for an uncareful analysis of data to lead online marketers either to analysis paralysis or sub-optimal optimization strategies. Is it any wonder that 70% of businesses collecting wed data fail to act on their analytics data?
Obviously this issue has been central to Bryan and Jeffrey Eisenberg’s Web careers since the beginning. It’s why they helped found the Web Analytics Association; why they published The Marketer’s Common Sense Guide to eMetrics, Call to Action and Always Be Testing; why they created Persuasion Architecture; and ultimately why they’ve built the OnTarget program.
The central theme amongst all of these issues is bringing clarity and actionable insight to Web improvement and online marketing efforts. They are all answers to the business owner who feels confused or disoriented by the data he’s given and want’s a clear direction toward more sales/conversions and improved website performance.
So, if you find yourself struggling to make sense of your online marketing data, or frustrated by non- or counter-productive optimization efforts, ask yourself: are you giving credit where it’s deserved? Or do you need help achieving greater clarity and actionable insight from your optimization efforts?
June 17th, 2009
3:34 pm
[...] Are Your Analytics Causing You to Lose 30% of Your Sales? [...]
June 17th, 2009
3:51 pm
Good points!
But hopefully people aren’t making PPC decisions purely on data from Google Analytics.
Google Adwords Conversion Tracking fx. uses a 30-days cookie to track conversions, without regarding other channels. That’s the (main) reason why you are seeing different conversion numbers in the two tools.
Both of them are as wrong as they are right in their method of tracking a conversion. But if you don’t know this basic stuff, can you really call yourself a Web Analyst?
Besides, only very few tools offer the posibility to track and measure delayed conversion, or which marketing channels a conversion has been exposed to. And most of them haven’t figured out yet how to do good reports on it.
Maybe there’s a subject for a future article there? I for one would love to hear more about it.
June 17th, 2009
4:48 pm
[...] Are Your Analytics Causing You to Lose 30% of Your Sales?, GrokDotCom [...]
June 17th, 2009
7:02 pm
This is great example of why you need to look at campaigns over time and with the right metrics. It’s commonly assumed that “real time” reporting means you can make real time changes but as your post clearly notes, conversions can take hours — even days for the right type of product. As a result one has to look at the conversion steps and the big picture as well as the size of a sample to be sure you aren’t making bad changes.
June 18th, 2009
7:47 am
[...] Are Your Analytics Causing You to Lose 30% of Your Sales?, GrokDotCom [...]
June 18th, 2009
9:04 am
basically it is important to look at everything you do from every angle not just one.
June 19th, 2009
3:24 pm
I totally agree.
I am in the travel business as an affiliate – and it is only in rare cases that the customers buy on their first visit.
June 20th, 2009
4:32 am
I never thought that trimming would potentialy cause a sales / conversion loss. I will be more careful with my ppc schemes
June 24th, 2009
10:55 am
[...] segmentation and personalization, and others. As Jeff Sexton recently pointed out, if you have the wrong analytics it could cost you 30% of your sales. Can you afford that [...]
June 25th, 2009
11:44 pm
[...] Jeff Sexton, “Are Your Analytics Causing You to Lose 30% of Your Sales?” GrokDotCom, Jun… Share and [...]
July 3rd, 2009
3:22 am
[...] di investimento e di gestione delle campagne online basate sul modello di attribuzione Last-click possono compromettere il rendimento delle attività di online advertising e di acquisizione di traffico [...]
July 18th, 2009
10:17 pm
Good Post , Thanks.
I find google analytics is not exact.
August 9th, 2009
10:43 am
Your comparision to Rodman is extremely close to a blog entry I did back in April:
http://blog.spurinteractive.com/tag/paid-search-tips/
great points and I really enjoyed the article!
August 9th, 2009
11:40 am
Kalin,
Wow! You weren’t kidding. I guess it’s easy to come to similar conclusions when experiencing similar PPC dynamics. Great post on your part, too. Thanks for pointing me to it.
- Jeff
August 29th, 2009
2:56 pm
Any recommendations on some keyword/conversion tracking software? Paid and free
August 29th, 2009
11:29 pm
Phoenix,
Not to sound too self-serving, but OnTarget is a good bet. I also believe that TeaLeaf can help with this sort of thing.
- Jeff
September 10th, 2009
6:18 pm
Well said. Too many companies don’t consider the importance of shoppers who may be interested on the first visit but more inclined to purchase at a later time. This is why addressing high-probability user needs and concerns is more important (but complementary to) a focus only on first-visit conversion.
September 11th, 2009
2:02 am
I find Google analytics to be inaccurate. What would you suggest would be the best?
September 14th, 2009
6:34 am
Google analytics just never did a good enough job for us, even though its an amazing service considering its free.
We ended up developing our own inhouse analytics software in the end, because we got true real time reporting, and we werre enable to issue trackers which helped us to track all activities of every visitor to the site as an individual. Tracking analytics this way, makes this a very powerful proposition.
We were also able to use the same software to track repeat visits from the same user, and their interaction with our email marketing. great stuff.
September 15th, 2009
1:00 pm
Geofree,
GA is a great tool! You just have to know how to set it up and also what it can and can’t do. If you want the kind of stuff that Khuram and I are talking about you need an additional tool. I’m biased, of course, but I recommend Future Now’s OnTarget
- jeff
September 24th, 2009
8:13 am
yeah .. Google Analytic is the best tool, until you know how to set it good..
September 24th, 2009
2:40 pm
Good article. This is unfortunatelly only one of the issues with GA
September 30th, 2009
8:28 am
Nice piece, thanks for sharing. The inaccuracy in stats is definitely one of the shortcomings of GA, combined with not actually owning the data yourself.
Phoenix Furniture: You can try Logaholic Web Analytics at http://www.logaholic.com.
It’s a smart and easy to use analytics tool, which will provide you with a thorough stats analysis. Logaholic isn’t free, but it’s certainly a lot cheaper than some other tools around. I have been using it myself for a while now and it does everything I need for my business.
October 12th, 2009
6:00 am
Thanks for good article.
October 17th, 2009
3:51 am
I was thinking GA is the best tool to track i see that it is not perfect.
Coloring pages for kids
Cat Coloring pages
October 18th, 2009
3:57 am
good article
it’s insightful and informative.
I think sometimes Google analytics didn’t do a good enough job for us
October 18th, 2009
9:13 am
Thanks for sharing, definatetly something to think about.
October 19th, 2009
10:34 pm
It’s pretty convenient that Google, the biggest vendor of PPC advertising, offers for free an analytics product that is designed to make them look good, isn’t it?
October 22nd, 2009
1:51 am
Good insights and some helpful resources. Thanks.
Much more to learn about Google Analytics than is obvious at first. I believe it’s time I checked out some other analytics resources beyond Google. Any suggestions?
October 27th, 2009
5:36 pm
People need to keep an eye on their domain properties. it makes such a vast difference in web performance.
October 28th, 2009
12:36 pm
Ouch, 30% is brutal, and I hope they re-configured their campaign to get those sales back. I know that when I am looking for something to buy, I will usually check a few websites, and then go back to the best site, or the site I trust more. I can see how this works, I do it all the time.
November 14th, 2009
3:58 pm
I’m sure you quickly set your client straight! The conversion rate can’t always be a one-to-one click to sale ratio, that’s just the nature of ecommerce. Many people use Google for research (even the PPC ads), so it’s important to give those people all the information they want in order to make them feel comfortable going through your checkout process.
November 15th, 2009
8:32 am
Thanks for the useful info..
November 15th, 2009
8:35 am
And. I think analytics increase the loading time of a webpage…
November 15th, 2009
9:46 am
Thanks for this great article. There are really better solutions than Google Analytics. But many of them cost lots of money…
November 16th, 2009
4:22 am
I can not believe that google analytics counts visit, if directly enter a URL or if you click on a bookmark, if that is the case, i indeed need to use a second source before concluding what’s actually going on my page.
Morten
November 21st, 2009
11:58 am
This completely makes sense. I however see one problem with targeting more of those that are reaching your page– You omit thinking outside the box and reaching those obscure searchers who may use a keyword your current visitors have never done.
November 21st, 2009
6:38 pm
Thanks for this important information. I never thought about that problem before…
November 22nd, 2009
2:23 am
What a great post. Thanks for the information.
November 25th, 2009
2:45 pm
I’ve been using Analytics since it was Urchin and never knew this. Thanks for the heads up.
Kevin McLain
Top Web Hosting Companies News
December 2nd, 2009
1:19 pm
Thanks for the informative AND detailed post. It’s always great to present this kind of information to savvy clients who are genuinely interested in improving their online ROI!
Kayvan Mott
December 24th, 2009
8:45 am
Marry Christmas and happy New Year 2010 from croatia.
January 7th, 2010
12:32 pm
Very interesting! It changes the whole prospective
January 12th, 2010
6:10 pm
Well, so far I totally relied on GA. From now on I will have to take also other analytic tools into account. Thanks for pointing that out!
January 19th, 2010
1:36 am
Wow, super interesting post. building a relationship with your visitors is the most important thing you can do, and having a way to track that would be priceless.
January 24th, 2010
3:35 pm
Thanks for helpful post.
January 28th, 2010
12:19 pm
Great read. Knowing what the visitors are actually doing in a web site is the most vital information every business owner should analyse
February 4th, 2010
5:50 pm
All the metrics in the world don’t add up until you involve the individual. Thanks for reminding us all that so vital point!
February 20th, 2010
12:15 am
Google Analytics is a really great tool form me. I dont think it can be inaccurate.
February 20th, 2010
8:06 am
Very in-depth and well-written article, thanks for it!
March 8th, 2010
1:22 pm
I have uninstalled awstats from my server. After reading this I will consider using awstats again instead of analytics and in google webmaster tools google analytics causes slow performance.
March 10th, 2010
5:37 pm
Really good blog. I need some dofollow blog?
March 12th, 2010
7:06 pm
Im dont know, go on some SEO site then ask.
March 14th, 2010
10:09 pm
Analytics are pretty good, but maybe you can’t trust them that much.
March 15th, 2010
10:46 pm
“70% of businesses collecting wed data fail to act on their analytics data?” I can tell you that it’s expensive to do right, but most companies fail to realize the ROI. P.S. I think there’s a typo in that sentence: “wed”