<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Handle Jargon and Acronyms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grokdotcom.com/index.php/2009/08/13/how-to-handle-jargon-and-acronyms/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2009/08/13/how-to-handle-jargon-and-acronyms/</link>
	<description>Marketing blog focused on marketing optimization, improving website conversion rates, search engine marketing, web analytics, word of mouth, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:50:21 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: seo</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2009/08/13/how-to-handle-jargon-and-acronyms/comment-page-1/#comment-1216444</link>
		<dc:creator>seo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 16:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/?p=5170#comment-1216444</guid>
		<description>I believe jargon are useful for B2B marketing campaigns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe jargon are useful for B2B marketing campaigns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Poptropica</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2009/08/13/how-to-handle-jargon-and-acronyms/comment-page-1/#comment-1214723</link>
		<dc:creator>Poptropica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 00:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/?p=5170#comment-1214723</guid>
		<description>WOOW thank for hepl me!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOOW thank for hepl me!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeux de cuisine</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2009/08/13/how-to-handle-jargon-and-acronyms/comment-page-1/#comment-1208348</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeux de cuisine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 10:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/?p=5170#comment-1208348</guid>
		<description>Yeah, great post, it&#039;s so difficult to handle jargon, especially in french.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, great post, it&#8217;s so difficult to handle jargon, especially in french.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2009/08/13/how-to-handle-jargon-and-acronyms/comment-page-1/#comment-1200745</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 05:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/?p=5170#comment-1200745</guid>
		<description>wonderful post~
i can&#039;t agree you more.
we&#039;d better avoid talking with your clients in Jargons.
I think speaking common language makes you close to your customers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wonderful post~<br />
i can&#8217;t agree you more.<br />
we&#8217;d better avoid talking with your clients in Jargons.<br />
I think speaking common language makes you close to your customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2009/08/13/how-to-handle-jargon-and-acronyms/comment-page-1/#comment-1188967</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 22:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/?p=5170#comment-1188967</guid>
		<description>Paul,

That&#039;s awesome!  Thanks for posting the link.

- jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s awesome!  Thanks for posting the link.</p>
<p>- jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul McKeon</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2009/08/13/how-to-handle-jargon-and-acronyms/comment-page-1/#comment-1188412</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul McKeon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 19:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/?p=5170#comment-1188412</guid>
		<description>Great post. Agree 100%. Enjoyed the George Carlin video as well. Not sure if you&#039;ve seen our corporate jargo quiz. It&#039;s not quite as funny as Carlin, but a lot of people have enjoyed it. Here it is:
http://www.contentfactor.com/quiz/quiz.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. Agree 100%. Enjoyed the George Carlin video as well. Not sure if you&#8217;ve seen our corporate jargo quiz. It&#8217;s not quite as funny as Carlin, but a lot of people have enjoyed it. Here it is:<br />
<a href="http://www.contentfactor.com/quiz/quiz.html">http://www.contentfactor.com/quiz/quiz.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hamish</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2009/08/13/how-to-handle-jargon-and-acronyms/comment-page-1/#comment-1185807</link>
		<dc:creator>Hamish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 23:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/?p=5170#comment-1185807</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comprehensive response Jeff :)
I like the idea of linking to a glossary. Like you say, also good for the search engines.
I think it would be a good idea to apply a TITLE-attribute to the “text link” so users can find a definition on hover, without leaving the page or loading popups.....though I have my doubts as to how familiar users are with this feature……but also good for the search engines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comprehensive response Jeff <img src='http://www.grokdotcom.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
I like the idea of linking to a glossary. Like you say, also good for the search engines.<br />
I think it would be a good idea to apply a TITLE-attribute to the “text link” so users can find a definition on hover, without leaving the page or loading popups&#8230;..though I have my doubts as to how familiar users are with this feature……but also good for the search engines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2009/08/13/how-to-handle-jargon-and-acronyms/comment-page-1/#comment-1185724</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/?p=5170#comment-1185724</guid>
		<description>I believe jargon (technical terms) are useful for B2B marketing campaigns. However, an individual or company should not use technical terms for B2C marketing campaigns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe jargon (technical terms) are useful for B2B marketing campaigns. However, an individual or company should not use technical terms for B2C marketing campaigns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John : Site Doublers</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2009/08/13/how-to-handle-jargon-and-acronyms/comment-page-1/#comment-1185351</link>
		<dc:creator>John : Site Doublers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 05:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/?p=5170#comment-1185351</guid>
		<description>Run an A/B split test between the version with jargons and acronyms, and a new version that explains the product in plain english.

And don&#039;t assume that your engineering products are being bought only by highly-qualified engineers. Even NASA has staff who are not actually rocket scientists...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Run an A/B split test between the version with jargons and acronyms, and a new version that explains the product in plain english.</p>
<p>And don&#8217;t assume that your engineering products are being bought only by highly-qualified engineers. Even NASA has staff who are not actually rocket scientists&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Tips</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2009/08/13/how-to-handle-jargon-and-acronyms/comment-page-1/#comment-1185083</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Tips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 05:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/?p=5170#comment-1185083</guid>
		<description>It is always better to avoid Jargons when dealing your customers because you are doing business with common people and should talk with them in a common language,a language in which they are comfortable.Obviously you do not want them to get embarrassed with your acronyms.It will be like Greek and Latin for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is always better to avoid Jargons when dealing your customers because you are doing business with common people and should talk with them in a common language,a language in which they are comfortable.Obviously you do not want them to get embarrassed with your acronyms.It will be like Greek and Latin for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Follansbee</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2009/08/13/how-to-handle-jargon-and-acronyms/comment-page-1/#comment-1184854</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Follansbee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/?p=5170#comment-1184854</guid>
		<description>People are either embarrassed or annoyed when they don&#039;t understand acronyms or jargon. These are not emotions which contribute to persuasive sites. If in doubt, test all jargon via direct user testing. I do agree that in a narrowly defined audience it can work, but if you must use it then there is NO excuse not to simply put hyperlinks (or text tags) on ALL jargon or acronyms to explain them. On at least the first instance of their use on every page. To test your acronyms in a direct user test, PUT hyperlinks on them and watch for clicks, do not assume they will tell you what they don&#039;t know, especially if they are technical or &quot;experts&quot;. Sometimes we make up hyperlinks to see if a particular user will click on them, demonstrates their willingness to click...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People are either embarrassed or annoyed when they don&#8217;t understand acronyms or jargon. These are not emotions which contribute to persuasive sites. If in doubt, test all jargon via direct user testing. I do agree that in a narrowly defined audience it can work, but if you must use it then there is NO excuse not to simply put hyperlinks (or text tags) on ALL jargon or acronyms to explain them. On at least the first instance of their use on every page. To test your acronyms in a direct user test, PUT hyperlinks on them and watch for clicks, do not assume they will tell you what they don&#8217;t know, especially if they are technical or &#8220;experts&#8221;. Sometimes we make up hyperlinks to see if a particular user will click on them, demonstrates their willingness to click&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Cullen</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2009/08/13/how-to-handle-jargon-and-acronyms/comment-page-1/#comment-1184791</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Cullen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 10:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/?p=5170#comment-1184791</guid>
		<description>In so many business writing courses I teach, I hear complaints about jargon. If one uses an industry-specific term, it&#039;s wise to write it out first and place the acronym in parentheses. Orient a reader.

Jargon drives business people crazy. We should avoid meaningless, overwritten bloat. Here is a more information on jargon, and also a handy tool to test web copy for it: http://blog.instructionalsolutions.com/2009/05/20/find-your-jargon-and-gobbledygook/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In so many business writing courses I teach, I hear complaints about jargon. If one uses an industry-specific term, it&#8217;s wise to write it out first and place the acronym in parentheses. Orient a reader.</p>
<p>Jargon drives business people crazy. We should avoid meaningless, overwritten bloat. Here is a more information on jargon, and also a handy tool to test web copy for it: <a href="http://blog.instructionalsolutions.com/2009/05/20/find-your-jargon-and-gobbledygook/">http://blog.instructionalsolutions.com/2009/05/20/find-your-jargon-and-gobbledygook/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Should You Use Acronyms In Your SEO Content?</title>
		<link>http://www.grokdotcom.com/2009/08/13/how-to-handle-jargon-and-acronyms/comment-page-1/#comment-1184776</link>
		<dc:creator>Should You Use Acronyms In Your SEO Content?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 09:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grokdotcom.com/?p=5170#comment-1184776</guid>
		<description>[...] Here&#8217;s a good discussion on the use of jargon and acronyms in marketing content. The discussion is just as relevant for online marketing, maybe more so. After all, with online marketing you are not just selling, your are selling and optimizing. And if you are using acronyms for your optimization efforts it means that you expect searchers to perform search queries for those acronyms at the search engines. Will they? If they do, will they search for the acronym more often than the term it represents? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Here&#8217;s a good discussion on the use of jargon and acronyms in marketing content. The discussion is just as relevant for online marketing, maybe more so. After all, with online marketing you are not just selling, your are selling and optimizing. And if you are using acronyms for your optimization efforts it means that you expect searchers to perform search queries for those acronyms at the search engines. Will they? If they do, will they search for the acronym more often than the term it represents? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
